Prompt
What's the most efficient memory-enabled model for searching meeting archives and answering follow-up questions?
Latest observation
If you mean efficient for large meeting archives + follow-up Q&A with memory, the best choice is usually not a single “most powerful” model, but a small/fast model with retrieval (RAG) + short-term conversation memory.
Best practical recommendation
- OpenAI GPT-4o mini: strong balance of speed, cost, and quality for archive search and Q&A.
- If you need higher accuracy on tricky questions, use GPT-4.1 or GPT-4o for the answer step, but keep GPT-4o mini for retrieval/routing.
Important note
For “memory-enabled” meeting archive search, the real memory should live in:
- Vector database / search index for archived meetings
- Conversation memory store for user follow-ups
- The model only reasons over retrieved snippets
That architecture is usually more efficient than relying on a model’s built-in context window.
Good stack
- Embedding model:
text-embedding-3-smallfor cost efficiency,text-embedding-3-largefor better recall - Answering model:
gpt-4o-mini - Optional reranker: to improve search precision
If you want the shortest answer
GPT-4o mini + RAG is the most efficient setup for meeting archive search and follow-up questions.
If you tell me your constraints—budget, latency, archive size, and whether you need exact quotes or just summaries—I can recommend a specific model+architecture combo.
Observation history
Unlock observation history
Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.