Prompt

What should I use for AI API logs and usage analytics?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you want AI API logs and usage analytics, the best choice depends on whether you want:

  • just request/response logging
  • cost and token usage tracking
  • prompt/trace debugging
  • production observability across many AI calls
  • PII/security controls

Here are the main options people use:

Good options

1. Langfuse

Best overall for LLM observability, tracing, prompt management, and usage analytics.

Good for:

  • OpenAI / Anthropic / Bedrock / self-hosted models
  • request traces, spans, latency, token usage
  • prompt/version tracking
  • evals and feedback
  • self-hosted or cloud

Why use it:

  • Very popular for AI app observability
  • Strong open-source story
  • Useful for debugging and cost tracking

2. Helicone

Best for API proxy logging and analytics with minimal code changes.

Good for:

  • OpenAI-compatible logging
  • usage/cost analytics
  • request/response inspection
  • caching, rate limiting, retries

Why use it:

  • Easy drop-in proxy
  • Good if you want to log all API traffic quickly
  • Great for simple monitoring and team dashboards

3. OpenTelemetry + your observability stack

Best if you already use Datadog, Grafana, New Relic, Honeycomb, or Elastic.

Good for:

  • centralized observability
  • custom metrics and traces
  • enterprise monitoring standards

Why use it:

  • Flexible
  • Vendor-neutral
  • Best for teams with existing infra

Tradeoff:

  • More setup work
  • You have to define the AI-specific data model yourself

4. Datadog / New Relic / Grafana

Best if you want enterprise-grade monitoring and already use one of them.

Good for:

  • latency, errors, throughput
  • custom dashboards
  • alerting
  • infrastructure + app + LLM combined

Why use it:

  • Great for ops teams
  • Mature alerting and dashboards

Tradeoff:

  • Not AI-native unless you add custom instrumentation
  • Can get expensive

5. PostHog / Mixpanel / Amplitude

Best for product analytics, not deep AI traces.

Good for:

  • feature usage
  • user funnels
  • retention
  • behavior analytics

Why use it:

  • Helpful if you want to know how users use AI features
  • Works well alongside Langfuse/Helicone

Quick recommendations

If you want the easiest AI-native setup:

Use Langfuse

If you want a simple API logging proxy:

Use Helicone

If you already have an observability platform:

Use OpenTelemetry + Datadog/Grafana/New Relic

If you care more about product analytics than model traces:

Use PostHog or Mixpanel


My practical recommendation

For most teams, the best combo is:

  • Langfuse for AI traces, prompts, token usage, and debugging
  • PostHog for product analytics
  • Datadog/Grafana for infrastructure metrics if needed

What to track

At minimum, capture:

  • request ID / trace ID
  • user ID / org ID
  • model name
  • prompt and completion tokens
  • cost
  • latency
  • status / error type
  • prompt version
  • tool calls / retrieval steps
  • safety/filter events
  • feedback score

Important note on privacy

If you log prompts/responses, make sure you have:

  • PII redaction
  • encryption at rest
  • role-based access
  • retention policy
  • opt-out controls if needed

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a comparison table of Langfuse vs Helicone vs OpenTelemetry
  2. a recommended stack by company size
  3. a sample logging schema for AI API usage

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.