Prompt

What should I use for cheap AI inference in an app?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 8, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 8, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you want cheap AI inference in an app, the best choice depends on whether you need text, images, speech, or embeddings, but in general:

Good low-cost options

1. Use smaller open-source models via a hosted API

Best when you want easy integration and lower cost than frontier models.

Examples:

  • OpenAI: small/mini models for text tasks
  • Anthropic / Google / Mistral / Together / Fireworks / Groq: often cheaper options for certain workloads
  • Open-source models hosted on providers:
    • Llama 3.x small variants
    • Mistral 7B / Mixtral
    • Qwen small models

Why:

  • No infra to manage
  • Pay per token/request
  • Easy to scale

2. Run an open-source model on your own GPU

Best if you have enough traffic to amortize hardware cost.

Common stack:

  • vLLM or TGI for serving
  • Llama / Mistral / Qwen models
  • A single decent GPU can be much cheaper than API calls at moderate/high volume

Why:

  • Lowest marginal cost at scale
  • Full control
  • Can optimize aggressively

Tradeoff:

  • Ops complexity
  • You need traffic to justify it

3. Use serverless GPU providers

Good middle ground between hosted APIs and self-hosting.

Examples:

  • Modal
  • Runpod
  • Replicate
  • Baseten
  • Beam

Why:

  • Can be cheaper for bursty workloads
  • Less ops than self-hosting
  • Often good for prototypes and moderate production use

4. Use distilled/small models

If your task is narrow, this is usually the cheapest.

Examples:

  • Tiny LLMs for classification, extraction, routing
  • Embedding models instead of full LLMs for search
  • Smaller vision models for OCR/classification

Why:

  • Much lower inference cost
  • Faster latency
  • Often enough for app features

Rule of thumb

  • Prototype / low traffic: hosted API
  • Moderate traffic, bursty: serverless GPU
  • High traffic: self-host open-source on GPU
  • Simple tasks: use the smallest possible model, or embeddings/classifiers instead of an LLM

Ways to cut cost a lot

  • Use smaller models first
  • Cache repeated prompts/results
  • Trim context aggressively
  • Use RAG so the model reads less
  • Use streaming only when needed
  • Batch requests where possible
  • Prefer text-only over multimodal if you can

My default recommendation

If you’re building an app and care about cheap inference:

  1. Start with a small hosted model
  2. If cost grows, move to serverless GPU
  3. If usage is steady and high, self-host an open-source model

If you want, I can give you a specific cheapest option by use case:

  • chat app
  • image generation
  • OCR/extraction
  • embeddings/search
  • speech-to-text
  • classification/routing

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.