Prompt
What should I use for end-to-end tracing across prompt, retrieval, and model calls?
Latest observation
Oct 9, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
For end-to-end tracing across prompt → retrieval → model calls, use a tracing system that can follow a single request through all stages and keep the spans linked.
Good options:
- OpenTelemetry: best general-purpose standard if you want vendor-neutral distributed tracing across your stack.
- LangSmith: strong choice if you’re building LLM apps with LangChain and want prompt, retriever, tool, and model-level traces.
- Arize Phoenix: useful for LLM observability, retrieval inspection, and evaluation workflows.
- Weights & Biases Weave: good for experiment tracking plus LLM traces.
- Datadog / Honeycomb / New Relic: if you already use one of these for infra observability, they can trace LLM pipelines too.
My recommendation
- If you want the most standard, flexible approach: OpenTelemetry
- If you want the best developer experience for LLM apps: LangSmith
- If you care a lot about retrieval quality and RAG debugging: Phoenix
What to trace
Make sure your trace captures:
- user request / session id
- prompt templates and final prompt text
- retrieval query, top-k results, scores, chunk ids
- reranking steps, if any
- model name, parameters, latency, token usage
- tool calls / function calls
- final response and error states
Practical setup
A common pattern is:
- Create a root trace for the user request.
- Add child spans for:
- input normalization
- retrieval
- reranking
- prompt assembly
- LLM call
- post-processing
- Export to your tracing backend.
If you tell me your stack (Python/JS, LangChain/LlamaIndex/custom, cloud vendor), I can suggest the best specific setup.