Prompt

What should I use for observability across frontend, backend, and infra?

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Oct 19, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 19, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A good observability stack usually has three layers:

  1. Frontend: capture user experience, JS errors, page performance
  2. Backend: traces, logs, metrics, errors
  3. Infra: host/container/Kubernetes metrics, logs, alerts

Best default recommendation

If you want one practical, widely used setup:

  • OpenTelemetry for instrumentation and trace collection
  • Prometheus + Grafana for metrics and dashboards
  • Loki for logs
  • Tempo or Jaeger for traces
  • Sentry for frontend and backend error tracking

That gives you:

  • metrics: “Is the system healthy?”
  • logs: “What happened?”
  • traces: “Where is latency coming from?”
  • errors: “What broke for users?”

If you want a simpler, mostly managed stack

If you don’t want to operate the observability tooling yourself:

  • Datadog: strongest all-in-one option
  • New Relic: good all-in-one alternative
  • Grafana Cloud: good balance of managed + open source
  • Honeycomb: excellent for tracing/debugging distributed systems
  • Sentry: best for app errors and frontend issues

A common managed combo is:

  • Datadog for infra + APM + logs
  • Sentry for frontend/backend errors

What to use by layer

Frontend

Use:

  • Sentry for JS errors, session replay, release health
  • OpenTelemetry or vendor SDK for frontend tracing
  • Real User Monitoring (RUM) if available

Track:

  • page load time
  • Core Web Vitals
  • JS exceptions
  • API latency from the browser
  • user sessions and crashes

Backend

Use:

  • OpenTelemetry SDKs
  • tracing with context propagation
  • structured logs
  • metrics via Prometheus/OpenTelemetry

Track:

  • request latency
  • error rate
  • throughput
  • dependency latency
  • DB query timings
  • queue lag
  • saturation signals

Infra

Use:

  • Prometheus node exporters / kube-state-metrics / cAdvisor
  • Grafana
  • Loki for centralized logs
  • cloud-native monitoring if on AWS/GCP/Azure

Track:

  • CPU/memory/disk/network
  • pod/container restarts
  • node pressure
  • autoscaling behavior
  • service availability
  • ingress/load balancer errors

Recommended architecture

If you’re starting from scratch:

  • Instrument apps with OpenTelemetry
  • Send:
    • traces to Tempo/Jaeger/Datadog/New Relic
    • metrics to Prometheus/Grafana Cloud/Datadog
    • logs to Loki/Elastic/Datadog
  • Use Sentry for app errors and frontend monitoring
  • Correlate everything with:
    • trace IDs
    • request IDs
    • user/session IDs where appropriate

My practical recommendation by team size

Small team / startup

  • Sentry
  • Grafana Cloud or Datadog
  • OpenTelemetry everywhere

Medium team

  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus + Grafana + Loki + Tempo
  • Sentry
  • Add alerting with PagerDuty/Opsgenie

Enterprise

  • Usually Datadog or Splunk Observability
  • Still use OpenTelemetry to avoid vendor lock-in

Rule of thumb

If you only choose one thing to standardize on:
Use OpenTelemetry as the instrumentation standard.

Then choose one vendor or stack for:

  • metrics
  • logs
  • traces
  • frontend error monitoring

If you want, I can give you:

  1. a best stack for AWS/GCP/Azure,
  2. a budget-conscious open-source stack, or
  3. a “minimal but solid” setup for a startup.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.