Prompt

What should I use for OpenTelemetry trace storage

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Oct 17, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 17, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

For OpenTelemetry, the “right” trace storage depends mostly on your scale, retention needs, and whether you want a managed or self-hosted setup. OpenTelemetry itself doesn’t store traces; it exports them to a backend.

Good options

1. Grafana Tempo

Best if you want a cost-effective, scalable tracing backend.

  • Designed specifically for traces
  • Cheap to run compared to full indexing systems
  • Integrates well with Grafana, Prometheus, Loki
  • Good choice for Kubernetes / cloud-native environments

Use this if: you want long-term trace storage at scale and already use Grafana.


2. Jaeger

Best for simpler deployments and classic distributed tracing workflows.

  • Very common and widely supported
  • Good UI and tracing features
  • Can use different storage backends
  • Easier for smaller teams to adopt

Use this if: you want something familiar and straightforward, especially for smaller or medium setups.


3. Elastic Observability

Best if you already use Elasticsearch.

  • Powerful search and correlation
  • Unified logs/metrics/traces
  • Good if you need advanced querying across observability data

Use this if: your org is already standardized on Elastic.


4. Commercial managed backends

Examples:

  • Honeycomb
  • Datadog
  • New Relic
  • Lightstep
  • Sentry (for some trace use cases)

Use this if: you want low operational overhead and strong UI/analytics.


5. Cloud-provider tracing

Examples:

  • AWS X-Ray
  • Google Cloud Trace
  • Azure Monitor / Application Insights

Use this if: you’re heavily committed to a single cloud and want native integration.


My practical recommendation

  • Small/simple setup: Jaeger
  • Best open-source scalable choice: Grafana Tempo
  • Already on Elasticsearch: Elastic
  • Want no ops: a managed SaaS backend

Important note

If you’re only asking about temporary storage or local dev, you can also use the OpenTelemetry Collector with an exporter to stdout/logs, but that’s not suitable for real trace retention.

If you want, I can recommend a backend based on your environment:

  • Kubernetes or VMs?
  • Cloud provider?
  • Expected trace volume?
  • Open source vs managed?

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.