Prompt

What should I use for routing requests between multiple LLM providers?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you want to route requests across multiple LLM providers, the best choice depends on whether you want simple failover/load balancing or policy-based routing with observability, retries, caching, and cost control.

Good options

1) LiteLLM

Best general-purpose answer for most teams.

  • Supports many providers through one OpenAI-compatible interface
  • Can do:
    • provider fallback
    • load balancing
    • retries
    • spend tracking
    • rate-limit handling
    • logging/observability
  • Works well as a routing proxy or as a library in your app

Use this if: you want a practical, widely used router without building a lot yourself.


2) OpenRouter

Best if you want a hosted aggregation layer.

  • One API for many models/providers
  • Easy to switch models
  • Handles provider access and routing for you

Use this if: you want convenience and don’t mind depending on a third-party broker.


3) Vercel AI Gateway / similar hosted gateways

Good if you’re already in a specific ecosystem and want minimal ops.

Use this if: you want managed routing and are already using that platform.


4) Custom router

Best if routing rules are business-specific.

Use your own service if you need:

  • choose provider based on prompt type
  • cost/performance SLAs
  • data residency / compliance constraints
  • custom fallbacks and A/B tests
  • per-tenant policies

Use this if: you have strong requirements that off-the-shelf routing won’t cover.


My recommendation

  • Most teams: start with LiteLLM
  • If you want a hosted aggregator: OpenRouter
  • If you need strict control/compliance: build a custom router

Things your router should ideally handle

  • provider fallback
  • retries with backoff
  • timeouts
  • rate-limit detection
  • cost-aware routing
  • model capability matching
  • logging and tracing
  • response normalization

If you want, I can give you:

  1. a feature comparison table of LiteLLM vs OpenRouter vs custom routing, or
  2. a recommended architecture for routing in production.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.