Prompt
What should I use for shared storage across multiple app servers?
Latest observation
Oct 12, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
It depends on what your app servers need from shared storage, but the most common choices are:
Best default choices
-
Object storage like Amazon S3 / Google Cloud Storage / Azure Blob
- Best for: uploads, assets, backups, logs, static files
- Pros: highly durable, cheap, scalable
- Cons: not a traditional filesystem; slower than local disk; app changes needed sometimes
-
Managed network file storage like AWS EFS / Azure Files / Google Filestore
- Best for: when multiple servers need the same POSIX-like filesystem
- Pros: mounted like a shared directory, easy for existing apps
- Cons: can be slower and more expensive than local disk; not ideal for heavy low-latency workloads
Other options
-
Distributed file systems like CephFS, GlusterFS, Lustre
- Best for: on-prem or specialized environments
- Pros: scalable, flexible
- Cons: more operational complexity
-
Shared block storage
- Usually not the right answer for multiple app servers, because block devices are generally meant to be attached to one server at a time unless you add clustering/locking layers.
Rule of thumb
- If you need files shared across app servers: use managed NFS/file storage
- If you need uploads/static content/backups: use object storage
- If you need very high performance or special on-prem requirements: consider CephFS or a similar distributed filesystem
Important design note
For web apps, the best practice is often:
- keep app servers stateless
- store user-generated files in object storage
- store session/state in a database or cache like Redis
If you tell me your stack and workload (e.g. web app, media uploads, VM images, on-prem vs cloud, Linux/Windows), I can recommend the best specific option.