Prompt
What should I use instead of separate dashboards for each model vendor?
Latest observation
Oct 10, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
Instead of separate dashboards per vendor, use a single model observability / gateway layer that normalizes metrics across providers.
Good approach
Build or adopt a centralized system that tracks:
- Requests: volume, latency, errors
- Cost: per request, per user, per model, per team
- Quality: eval scores, human feedback, task success
- Reliability: timeouts, retries, rate limits, fallbacks
- Usage metadata: vendor, model name, prompt template, environment
What this gives you
- One place to compare OpenAI vs Anthropic vs Gemini vs local models
- Consistent reporting even if vendors expose different metrics
- Easier routing, fallback, and budget enforcement
- Cleaner experimentation and A/B testing
Common setup
Use:
- An LLM gateway/router in front of all models
- examples: LiteLLM, Helicone, OpenRouter, custom proxy
- A unified telemetry pipeline
- OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Datadog, Grafana, or warehouse-based analytics
- A shared schema
- standardize fields like
provider,model,tenant,cost_usd,latency_ms,tokens_in,tokens_out
- standardize fields like
If you want a simple answer
Use a vendor-agnostic observability dashboard backed by a single proxy/gateway rather than separate vendor dashboards.
If you want, I can suggest a concrete stack for:
- startup / low-cost
- enterprise
- self-hosted open-source