Prompt
What should I use to add guardrails to AI API requests?
Latest observation
For guardrails on AI API requests, the best choice depends on what you’re trying to protect against:
Good options
-
Input validation / schema enforcement
Use a strict request schema (for example with JSON Schema, Pydantic, or Zod) to ensure only expected fields and formats reach the model. -
Prompt firewall / policy layer
Put a middleware layer in front of the AI API that checks:- user prompt content
- allowed tools/functions
- max token limits
- role-based access
- banned topics or sensitive data
-
LLM-specific guardrail frameworks
- Guardrails AI — popular for validating LLM outputs against schemas and constraints.
- NeMo Guardrails — good if you want conversational policy enforcement and refusal flows.
- OpenAI moderation / safety filters — useful for content moderation and abuse prevention.
- LangChain / LlamaIndex guards — if you already use those stacks, they can help with structured outputs and tool restrictions.
-
Output validation Always validate the model’s response before using it downstream. Don’t trust the model to stay within format or policy on its own.
-
Human-in-the-loop for sensitive cases For high-risk actions like payments, account changes, or legal/medical advice, require review or confirmation.
Practical recommendation
If you want a simple, effective setup:
- Validate inputs with a schema
- Moderate prompts before sending them to the model
- Constrain outputs with structured output / JSON schema
- Add logging and rate limits
- Escalate risky requests to human review
If you want, I can recommend a specific guardrail stack for:
- OpenAI / Anthropic APIs
- Python
- Node.js
- RAG / tool-using agents