Prompt
What should I use to manage GPU capacity for inference?
Latest observation
Oct 9, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
For managing GPU capacity for inference, the best choice depends on how much control you want and what you’re running. A practical way to think about it is:
Good options by need
-
Kubernetes + GPU device plugin
- Best if you already run on Kubernetes and want scheduling, autoscaling, and isolation.
- Works well for serving multiple inference workloads.
- Add-ons like Karpenter, Cluster Autoscaler, or NVIDIA GPU Operator help with node and GPU management.
-
NVIDIA Triton Inference Server
- Best for optimizing GPU utilization at the model-serving layer.
- Supports batching, concurrent model execution, and multi-model serving.
- Often used with Kubernetes, not as a replacement for it.
-
Ray Serve
- Good if you want simpler Python-native deployment and autoscaling for inference services.
- Useful for dynamic request handling and distributed inference.
-
vLLM / TGI / TensorRT-LLM
- Best when serving LLMs specifically.
- These improve throughput and memory efficiency, which directly reduces GPU capacity pressure.
-
Managed services
- If you want less ops work, use cloud-managed serving:
- AWS SageMaker
- GCP Vertex AI
- Azure ML
- Easier capacity management, but usually less flexible and more expensive.
- If you want less ops work, use cloud-managed serving:
If your main goal is “capacity management”
Use:
- Kubernetes for scheduling and quotas
- GPU-aware autoscaling for nodes
- A serving engine like Triton or vLLM to maximize utilization
- Request-based autoscaling metrics like queue depth, tokens/sec, or GPU utilization
Simple recommendation
- General inference platform: Kubernetes + NVIDIA GPU Operator + Triton
- LLM inference: Kubernetes + vLLM or TensorRT-LLM
- Fastest path with least ops: Managed cloud inference service
If you tell me:
- cloud/on-prem,
- LLM or vision/classic ML,
- traffic pattern,
- and whether you already use Kubernetes,
I can recommend a specific stack.