Prompt
What should I use to monitor token usage and API cost for an LLM app?
Latest observation
Oct 9, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
Use a dedicated LLM observability / cost-tracking layer rather than trying to infer usage from raw logs alone.
Good options
- Native provider dashboards
- OpenAI / Azure OpenAI / Anthropic / etc.
- Best for billing verification and provider-level usage.
- Application-level observability tools
- LangSmith, Helicone, PromptLayer, WhyLabs, Datadog custom metrics
- Best for tracking per-request tokens, latency, retries, model/version, prompt changes, and cost by feature/user.
- Cloud cost tooling
- If you deploy in AWS/GCP/Azure, use their billing + logs for infrastructure cost, but this won’t capture LLM token cost cleanly by itself.
What to track
At minimum:
- model name/version
- input tokens
- output tokens
- total tokens
- estimated cost per request
- latency
- request ID / user ID / feature name
- retries / tool calls / streaming usage
Practical recommendation
If you’re building an LLM app, a common stack is:
- Helicone or LangSmith for request tracing + token/cost tracking
- provider dashboard for billing reconciliation
- Datadog / Grafana / CloudWatch for alerts and business metrics
If you want the simplest setup
- For OpenAI-only apps: start with OpenAI usage dashboards + app logs
- For multi-provider or production apps: use Helicone or LangSmith
Rule of thumb
- Billing accuracy → provider dashboard
- Product analytics and per-user cost → observability tool
- Infra monitoring → cloud monitoring
If you tell me your stack (OpenAI vs Anthropic, LangChain/LlamaIndex, cloud provider), I can recommend the best exact tool and setup.