Prompt

what should I use to search across PDFs and images semantically?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Search1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you want to search across PDFs and images semantically (not just keyword matching), you usually want a multimodal retrieval stack:

Best approach

  1. Extract text from PDFs

    • If PDFs have selectable text: use normal text extraction.
    • If they’re scanned: run OCR first.
  2. Process images with OCR and/or vision embeddings

    • For text in images: OCR.
    • For general visual similarity or content search: use image embeddings.
  3. Store everything in a vector database

    • Chunk PDF text and OCR output.
    • Generate embeddings for both text and images.
    • Put them in a vector DB for semantic search.

Good model choices

For text/PDF semantic search

  • OpenAI text embeddings: strong general-purpose embeddings
  • BGE / E5: popular open-source alternatives
  • Cohere Embed: also solid

For images

  • CLIP / SigLIP: classic image-text embedding models
  • OpenAI multimodal embeddings if you want a managed API and unified search
  • BLIP / Florence / other vision-language models for richer understanding, depending on your use case

For OCR

  • Tesseract: free, but weaker on messy docs
  • PaddleOCR: often better for real-world scans
  • AWS Textract / Google Document AI / Azure OCR: strong managed options

Vector databases

  • Pinecone: managed, easy scaling
  • Weaviate: good multimodal support
  • Milvus: powerful open-source
  • Qdrant: simple and popular
  • FAISS: good if you want local/index-only

Practical recommendation

If you want the simplest robust setup:

  • PDF text: extract text with PyMuPDF / pdfplumber
  • Scanned PDFs + images: OCR with PaddleOCR or Textract
  • Embeddings:
    • text: OpenAI embeddings or BGE
    • images: CLIP/SigLIP or a multimodal embedding model
  • Search backend: Qdrant or Weaviate

If you want one unified semantic search over both text and images

Look for a shared embedding space:

  • CLIP-style models are ideal because both images and text map into the same vector space.
  • That makes cross-modal search easier, e.g.:
    • search with text, retrieve images
    • search with image, retrieve text-heavy docs

Rule of thumb

  • If documents are mostly textual: OCR + text embeddings + vector DB
  • If you need true cross-modal search: OCR + CLIP-style embeddings + vector DB
  • If documents are complex layouts: add document parsing tools like docling, unstructured, or layoutparser

If you want, I can recommend a specific stack for:

  • local/open-source only
  • best managed/cloud
  • highest accuracy
  • cheapest setup

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.