Prompt

What should I use to standardize requests to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A good way to standardize requests across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini is to use a provider-agnostic abstraction layer rather than calling each SDK directly.

Best options

1) LiteLLM

Probably the most practical choice if you want a single OpenAI-style interface for multiple model providers.

  • Supports OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Azure, Cohere, etc.
  • Lets you keep a mostly consistent request format
  • Works in Python and via a proxy server
  • Good for switching models/providers with minimal code changes

Best if: you want a simple drop-in layer and flexibility.


2) OpenAI-compatible gateways / proxies

Tools like:

  • LiteLLM Proxy
  • Helicone
  • OpenRouter
  • Some self-hosted gateways

These can normalize requests and sometimes also handle logging, routing, retries, and cost tracking.

Best if: you want central control, observability, or multi-provider routing.


3) LangChain / LlamaIndex

These are more than just standardization layers—they’re full frameworks for building AI apps.

  • They provide unified wrappers for models
  • Good for agents, RAG, tool use, chains, etc.
  • Heavier than necessary if all you want is request normalization

Best if: you’re already using their ecosystem.


Recommendation

If your main goal is just to standardize API requests across the three providers, I’d start with:

  • LiteLLM for code-level abstraction
  • LiteLLM Proxy if you want a centralized service
  • OpenRouter if you want access through one endpoint and don’t mind an intermediary platform

Practical note

There’s no perfect 1:1 standard because OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini differ in:

  • message schemas
  • tool/function calling
  • system prompt handling
  • multimodal input formats
  • streaming/event formats

So the right abstraction should normalize the common parts and let you handle provider-specific edge cases when needed.

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a comparison table of LiteLLM vs LangChain vs direct SDKs, or
  2. a sample normalized request schema you can use in your own app.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.