Prompt

What should I use to track hallucinations and unsafe outputs in my chatbot?

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Oct 9, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 9, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

To track hallucinations and unsafe outputs in a chatbot, you generally want a combination of logging, evaluation, and monitoring tools rather than just one thing.

What to use

1. Conversation logging

Store:

  • user prompts
  • model responses
  • retrieved sources/context
  • model version, temperature, prompts, system messages
  • timestamps, latency, token usage
  • user feedback and moderation flags

This is the foundation for finding bad outputs later.

2. Automated safety filters / moderation

Use a classifier or moderation layer to detect:

  • toxic language
  • self-harm content
  • harassment
  • sexual content
  • violent content
  • policy-violating or dangerous instructions

Examples:

  • OpenAI Moderation
  • Azure AI Content Safety
  • Google Perspective API for toxicity
  • custom classifiers for domain-specific risks

3. Hallucination / factuality evaluation

Track whether the answer is grounded in allowed sources or retrieval context.

Useful approaches:

  • RAG faithfulness checks
  • citation verification
  • answer-vs-context consistency scoring
  • LLM-as-judge evals for factuality

Common tools/frameworks:

  • Ragas
  • TruLens
  • DeepEval
  • Arize Phoenix
  • LangSmith evals
  • Langfuse evals/observability

4. Human review workflow

Automatically flag:

  • low-confidence responses
  • safety-filter hits
  • answers with missing citations
  • user complaints
  • high-impact domains like medical/legal/financial advice

Then send them to a review queue.

5. Monitoring dashboards

Track metrics over time:

  • hallucination rate
  • unsafe output rate
  • refusal rate
  • escalation rate
  • user-reported bad answers
  • retrieval failure rate
  • confidence/grounding scores

Good practical stack

If you want a solid default setup:

  • Langfuse or LangSmith for tracing and observability
  • OpenAI Moderation or Azure AI Content Safety for safety filtering
  • Ragas or TruLens for hallucination/factuality evals
  • Human review queue for flagged conversations

Recommendation by use case

  • Simple chatbot: logging + moderation + manual review
  • RAG chatbot: logging + citation checks + RAG evals
  • High-risk domain: logging + moderation + factuality evals + human review + strict policies

If you want, I can suggest a specific stack for your backend like Python, Node.js, OpenAI, LangChain, or LlamaIndex.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.