Prompt

Why am I getting inconsistent extraction results from my model API?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 8, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 8, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Inconsistent extraction results usually come from one or more of these factors:

  1. Model randomness / sampling settings

    • If temperature is above 0, outputs can vary.
    • Higher top_p, top_k, or other sampling controls can also increase variability.
    • For extraction tasks, use low or zero temperature when possible.
  2. Prompt ambiguity

    • If the instructions aren’t very specific, the model may interpret the task differently across runs.
    • Missing examples, unclear field definitions, or vague formatting requirements often cause drift.
  3. Input variation

    • Small differences in the source text, formatting, whitespace, OCR errors, or truncated content can lead to different extractions.
    • Make sure the exact input is the same each time.
  4. Non-deterministic backend behavior

    • Even with the same settings, some hosted APIs can still produce slightly different results due to model updates, load balancing, or infrastructure changes.
    • If the provider silently upgrades the model version, outputs may change.
  5. Context window issues

    • If the input is long and near the context limit, the model may lose earlier details.
    • Truncation or partial context can cause inconsistent field extraction.
  6. Output schema not enforced

    • If the model is free-form generating text, it may vary in structure.
    • Use structured output features if available:
      • JSON schema / function calling / tool calling
      • strict response format
      • validation with retries
  7. Post-processing differences

    • Sometimes the inconsistency comes from your parsing code rather than the model.
    • Different JSON parsers, regexes, or cleanup logic can make the same response look different.

How to make extraction more stable

  • Set temperature = 0
  • Use a fixed model version if the API supports it
  • Use structured outputs or function calling
  • Make the prompt explicit:
    • define each field
    • specify allowed null/empty behavior
    • provide a few examples
  • Validate output and retry on invalid format
  • Keep input normalization consistent

Best practice for extraction

If your task is extraction rather than generation, treat it like a parsing problem:

  • give the model a strict schema
  • ask for only the fields you need
  • forbid extra text
  • validate the result programmatically

If you want, I can help you diagnose this more specifically if you share:

  • the model name
  • your prompt
  • your API parameters
  • a couple of example inputs/outputs

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.